Hospital staff and administrators.

When anyone ever meets them for the first time or runs into them, they will most likely have to wonder of that person has seen this. They will also wonder if they will ever admit to seeing it. Will it change opinions or decisions?

Barney Bier

What do you know. he signed this...

How would he know my mothers situation.  I guess he must believe everything that hospital just up and tells him.

He was not representing my mother.

fact of life number one

If self policing wasn't an inherent conflict of interest, the EOIG would have never been assigned to DHS cases.

yet another view

One flew over the  cuckoos nest

here's the deal...

A good faith payment may be paid by anyone to myself of $50,000 after taxes. My home  at 2043 elm in quincy will need to be acquisitioned and title deed placed in my name. My son Joseph john-henry heeger will need to be returned full custody to myself. This site will be here until then.

Court Ordered Forced Drugging

medicaid fraud initiative

Wikipedia - Litvak

This is most likely why Jordan.Litvak@Illinois.gov no longer functions.

Frolic and detour

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Part of the common law series
Tort law
Intentional torts
Assault Battery False imprisonment Intentional infliction of emotional distress Transferred intent
Property torts
Trespass land chattels Conversion Detinue Replevin Trover
Defenses
Assumption of risk Comparative negligence Contributory negligence Consent Necessity Statute of limitations Self-defense Defense of others Defense of property Shopkeeper's privilege
Negligence
Duty of / standard of care Proximate cause Res ipsa loquitur Calculus of negligence Rescue doctrine Duty to rescue Negligent infliction of emotional distress Employment-related Entrustment Malpractice legal medical
Liability torts
Product liability Quasi-tort Ultrahazardous activity
Nuisance
Public nuisance Rylands v Fletcher
Dignitary torts
Defamation Invasion of privacy False light Breach of confidence Abuse of process Malicious prosecution Alienation of affections Criminal conversation Seduction Breach of promise
Economic torts
Fraud Tortious interference Conspiracy Restraint of trade
Liability and remedies
Last clear chance Eggshell skull Vicarious liability Volenti non fit injuria Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Neutral reportage Damages Injunction Torts and conflict of laws Joint and several liability Comparative responsibility Market share liability
Duty to visitors
Trespassers Licensees Invitees Attractive nuisance
Other common law areas
Contracts Criminal law Evidence Property Wills, trusts, and estates
Law portal
v t e

Frolic and detour in the law of torts occur when an employee (or agent) makes a physical departure from the service of his employer (or principal). A detour occurs when an employee or agent makes a minor departure from his employer’s charge, whereas a frolic constitutes a major departure wherein the employee is acting on his own and for his own benefit, rather than a minor sidetrack in the course of obeying an order from the employer. The employer will be relieved of vicarious liability, which is usually assessed through the doctrine of respondeat superior for torts committed by the employee, only if the employee has deemed to engaged in a frolic.^[1] Similarly, in the law of workers' compensation, an employer is not liable for injuries incurred by an employee during a frolic; whereas the employer can still face liability for the results of a detour. Wikipedia to the right.

For families of McFarland Inmates.

PsychSearch.net/complaints/

For Legals: https://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/government-ethics/