Therapy?

 

Well?

 Another McFarland Letter?

Bailey for ILLINOIS GOVERNOR

 

moms account history

BLOG STATS

 

All Time    247362

Today                371

Yesterday        3387

This Month    41785

Last Month    10022

 

 

 

https://app.box.com/s/bjf7h4dfneeeqermvfs0btweq0xvut0b

Mom experienced this

Political abuse of psychiatry

 Coercive Control: In abusive relationships, perpetrators frequently use a victim's past trauma, anxiety, or formal diagnoses to strip away their credibility. By labeling a person as "crazy," "unstable," or "bipolar," the abuser invalidates the victim's legitimate boundaries and complaints

CliffordLaw.Com

They were the cause of my mothers legal issues. www.cliffordLawSucks.com

Citizen Participation Act.

(735 ILCS 110/1) 
    Sec. 1. Short title.   This Act may be cited as the Citizen Participation
Act.
        
(Source: P.A. 95-506, eff. 8-28-07.)                                                        

    (735 ILCS 110/5)     Sec. 5. Public policy. Pursuant to the fundamental philosophy of the American constitutional form of government, it is declared to be the public policy of the State of Illinois that the constitutional rights of citizens and organizations to be involved and participate freely in the process of government must be encouraged and safeguarded with great diligence. The information, reports, opinions, claims, arguments, and other expressions provided by citizens are vital to effective law enforcement, the operation of government, the making of public policy and decisions, and the continuation of representative democracy. The laws, courts, and other agencies of this State must provide the utmost protection for freedom of the press and the free exercise of these rights of petition, speech, association, and government participation.    Civil actions for money damages have been filed against citizens and organizations of this State as a result of their valid exercise of their constitutional rights to petition, speak freely, associate freely, and otherwise participate in and communicate with government. The press opining, reporting, or investigating matters of public concern is participating and communicating with the government. There has been a disturbing increase in lawsuits termed "Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation" in government or "SLAPPs" as they are popularly called.     The threat of SLAPPs significantly chills and diminishes citizen participation in government, voluntary public service, and the exercise of these important constitutional rights. This abuse of the judicial process can and has been used as a means of intimidating, harassing, or punishing citizens and organizations, including the press, for involving themselves in public affairs.     It is in the public interest and it is the purpose of this Act to strike a balance between the rights of persons to file lawsuits for injury and the constitutional rights of persons to petition, speak freely, associate freely, and otherwise participate in government; to protect and encourage public participation in government to the maximum extent permitted by law; to establish an efficient process for identification and adjudication of SLAPPs; and to provide for attorney's fees and costs to prevailing movants. As such, this Act should be construed broadly in striking the balance of rights described in this Act. (Source: P.A. 104-431, eff. 8-21-25.)                                                        
    (735 ILCS 110/10) 
    Sec. 10. Definitions.
In this Act:

                "Government" includes a branch, department, agency,
instrumentality, official, employee, agent, or other person acting under color
of law of the United States, a state, a subdivision of a state, or another
public authority including the electorate.

                "Person" includes any individual, corporation, association,
organization, partnership, 2 or more persons having a joint or common
interest, or other legal entity.

                "Judicial claim" or "claim" include any lawsuit, cause of
action, claim, cross-claim, counterclaim, or other judicial pleading or filing
alleging injury.

                "Motion" includes any motion to dismiss, for summary
judgment, or to strike, or any other judicial pleading filed to dispose
of a judicial claim.

                "Moving party" means any person on whose behalf a motion
described in subsection (a) of Section 20 is filed seeking dismissal of a
judicial claim.

                "Responding party" means any person against whom a motion
described in subsection (a) of Section 20 is filed.

        
(Source: P.A. 95-506, eff. 8-28-07.)                                                        

    (735 ILCS 110/15)     Sec. 15. Applicability. This Act applies to any motion to dispose of a claim in a judicial proceeding on the grounds that the claim is based on, relates to, or is in response to any act or acts of the moving party in furtherance of the moving party's rights of petition, speech, association, or to otherwise participate in government, including freedom of the press. The claim does not need to solely pertain to the moving party's constitutional rights as this Act applies regardless of the motives of the person who brought the claim that the moving party is seeking to dispose of.     Acts in furtherance of the constitutional rights to petition, speech, association, and participation in government, including freedom of the press, are immune from liability, regardless of intent or purpose, except when not genuinely aimed at procuring favorable government action, result, or outcome. (Source: P.A. 104-431, eff. 8-21-25.)                                                        

    (735 ILCS 110/17)     Sec. 17. Stay.     (a) Except as otherwise provided in subsections (d) through (g), on the filing of a motion under Section 15 of this Act:        (1) all other proceedings between the moving party     and responding party, including discovery and a pending hearing or motion, are stayed; and        (2) on motion by the moving party, the court may stay     a hearing or motion involving another party, or discovery by another party, if the hearing or ruling on the motion would adjudicate, or the discovery would relate to, an issue material to the motion to dispose of a claim under Section 15.    (b) A stay under subsection (a) remains in effect until entry of an order ruling on the motion to dispose of the claim under Section 15 and expiration of the time under Section 20 to appeal the order.    (c) Except as otherwise provided in subsections (e), (f), and (g), if a party appeals from an order ruling on the motion to dispose of the claim, all proceedings between all parties in the action are stayed. The stay remains in effect until the conclusion of the appeal.    (d) During a stay under subsection (a), the court may allow limited discovery as provided in Section 20.    (e) A motion under Section 25 for costs, attorney's fees, and expenses is not subject to a stay under this Section.    (f) A stay under this Section does not affect a party's ability voluntarily to dismiss a cause of action in whole or in part.    (g) During a stay under this Section, the court for good cause may hear and rule on:        (1) a motion unrelated to the motion to dispose of     the claim under Section 15; and        (2) a motion seeking a special or preliminary     injunction to protect against an imminent threat to public health or safety.
(Source: P.A. 104-431, eff. 8-21-25.)                                                        
    (735 ILCS 110/20) 
    Sec. 20. Motion procedure and standards.

                (a) On the filing of any motion as described in Section 15, a hearing and
decision on the motion must occur within 90 days after notice of the motion is
given to the
respondent.
An appellate
court shall expedite any appeal or other writ, whether interlocutory or not,
from a trial court order denying that motion or from a trial court's failure to
rule on that motion within 90 days after that trial court order or failure to
rule.

                (b) Discovery shall be suspended pending a decision on the motion. However,
discovery may be taken, upon leave of court for good cause shown, on the issue
of whether the movants
acts are not immunized from, or are not in furtherance of acts immunized
 from, liability by this Act.

                (c) The court shall grant the motion and dismiss the judicial claim unless
the court finds that the responding party has produced clear and convincing
evidence that the acts of the moving party are not immunized from, or are not
in
furtherance of acts immunized from, liability by this Act.

        
(Source: P.A. 95-506, eff. 8-28-07.)                                                        

    (735 ILCS 110/25)     Sec. 25. Attorney's fees and costs. The court shall award a moving party who prevails in a motion under this Act reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in connection with the motion. The court shall award a responding party who prevails in a motion under this Act reasonable attorney's fees and costs included in connection with the motion if the court finds that the motion was frivolous or filed solely with intent to delay the proceeding. (Source: P.A. 104-431, eff. 8-21-25.)                                                        
    (735 ILCS 110/30) 
    Sec. 30. Construction of Act.

                (a) Nothing in this Act shall limit or preclude any rights the
moving party may have under any other constitutional, statutory, case or common
law, or rule provisions.

                (b) This Act shall be construed liberally to effectuate its purposes and
intent fully.

        
(Source: P.A. 95-506, eff. 8-28-07.)                                                        

    (735 ILCS 110/32)     Sec. 32. Applicability. The changes made to this Act by this amendatory Act of the 104th General Assembly apply only to actions commenced on or after January 1, 2026.
(Source: P.A. 104-431, eff. 8-21-25.)                                                        
    (735 ILCS 110/35) 
    Sec. 35. Severability.   The provisions of this Act
are severable under Section 1.31 of the Statute on Statutes.

        
(Source: P.A. 95-506, eff. 8-28-07.)                                                        
    (735 ILCS 110/99) 
    Sec. 99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon becoming law.
(Source: P.A. 95-506, eff. 8-28-07.)

They changed the name from McFarland to Packard...Why?

Its been under investigation...

1. Political & State Abuse (Punitive Psychiatry)

Governments and state institutions have historically weaponized psychiatry to silence political dissidents, bypass standard legal rights, and avoid the public scrutiny of traditional criminal trials. [1]

Suppressing Dissidents: Pathologizing political disobedience allows regimes to lock up activists under the guise of medical treatment. For example, the Soviet Union extensively used the fabricated diagnosis of "sluggish schizophrenia" to permanently institutionalize anti-regime critics. [1]
Targeting Civil Rights Leaders: In the United States, declassified documents revealed that the FBI diagnosed Malcolm X with "pre-psychotic paranoid schizophrenia" to invalidate his calls for societal reform and justify heavy government surveillance. [1]
Social Enforcement & Gender Control: Historically, psychiatry enforced restrictive social norms. In the mid-20th century, women who rebelled against traditional domestic expectations or expressed independent anger were routinely diagnosed with "hysteria" and punitively subjected to forced Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) to break their resistance. 
Judge Zappa 

click me

 

The longer this letter stays out here.

It provides more proof that the staff at this fake hospital have mental disorders themselves...

They have no business labeling anybody  with  the false science of psychiatry.

Another Letter

You're reading material that is located in  and produced by a West Central Illinois citizen.

Stats

All Time221651

Today834

Yesterday3333

This Month16074

Last Month10022

I'm going to sell the letter they sent back to me after they opened it, made a copy of its content then taped it up.

$55 million after taxes to  an anonymous individual or group.

More proof of instability/corruption  with Springfield, IL and its "Hospital".

Change the name all you want. That place will always be hellish. The Governor is just as Hellish.

 

Time

 Pay up or it's getting more elements added...

weaponization of psychiatry

     The weaponization of psychiatry refers to the systemic or interpersonal misuse of psychiatric diagnoses, treatments, and terminology to control, delegitimize, or punish individuals. This exploitation manifests across political, social, and deeply personal domains. [1]

1. Political Abuse of Psychiatry

Throughout history, authoritarian regimes and state entities have leveraged medical authority to bypass legal systems and neutralize political dissent. [1, 2]

• Punitive Confinement: Labeling political dissidents as mentally ill allows the state to detain them indefinitely in psychiatric facilities without standard legal trials. [1]

• Delegitimizing Activism: Systemic institutions have historically pathologized social reform efforts. For instance, during the American Civil Rights movement, diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia were shifted to emphasize hostility and aggression, disproportionately pathologizing Black civil rights activists. Similarly, the FBI targeted activists like Malcolm X by framing their valid concerns over government surveillance as clinical paranoia. [1, 2]

• Invented Deviance: Creating fraudulent or heavily expanded psychiatric categories to classify civil disobedience or non-conformity as medical pathology. [1, 2]

2. Interpersonal Coercive Control

In intimate and domestic relationships, perpetrators frequently exploit mental health contexts to establish power imbalances. [1, 2]

• Weaponized Diagnoses: A partner’s real or fabricated mental health condition is used to undermine their credibility, isolate them, or make them doubt their own sanity—a tactic closely tied to coercive control and DARVO dynamics (Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim & Offender). [1, 2]

• Gendered Pathologization: Wielding traditional, harmful stereotypes—such as labeling women as "crazy," "hysterical," or "too emotional"—to dismiss logical objections or trauma responses. [1]

3. "Therapy Speak" and Cultural Misuse

The popularization of psychological language on digital platforms has led to a decentralized form of weaponization in everyday social interactions. [1, 2]

• Blame Shifting: Misusing clinical definitions to avoid accountability. For example, labeling an ordinary disagreement as "gaslighting" or characterizing an uncollaborative peer as a "narcissist". [1, 2]

• False Boundaries: Reframing rigid, controlling demands dictating another person's behavior under the protective guise of "setting personal boundaries".

    See Also: Political abuse of psychiatry

   

They still do it.

Weaponization of mental health

Covert Medication

Covert medication practices are the administration of medicines in a disguised form, usually in food or drink, to a patient without their knowledge or consent.^[1][2] The decision-making processes surrounding covert medication should be in the best interests of the patient; medications that are not contributing to positive health outcomes should not be administered.^[3]

^{Administrative Manipulation}

Tactics that McFarland sometimes uses to control people

On top of employing rapist....

Weaponizing psychiatry refers to the deliberate misuse of psychiatric diagnoses, treatments, or language to control, silence, or invalidate an individual or group. This exploitation occurs across multiple scales, ranging from state-sponsored political oppression to everyday interpersonal manipulation. [1]

State-Sponsored Punitive Psychiatry

Historically and globally, governments have manipulated the medical authority of psychiatry to bypass legal protections and suppress dissent. [1]

Political Abuse: The deliberate misdiagnosis of mentally healthy individuals to suppress their human rights. [1]
Soviet "Sluggish Schizophrenia": A politically motivated diagnosis utilized in the 20th century. It targeted political dissidents who showed no actual psychiatric symptoms. Symptoms were claimed to include a "struggle for truth" or "ideas of reforming society". [1]
Institutionalization as Detainment: Locking away political prisoners in psychiatric facilities. This tactic avoids the public scrutiny of a standard legal trial. [1]
Historical Systemic Marginalization: The historical use of psychiatric labels to institutionalize or discredit marginalized communities, such as Black civil rights activists or women rejecting traditional domestic roles. [1, 2]

Interpersonal Abuse and Coercive Control

Within domestic relationships, abusers frequently leverage mental health contexts to establish dominance and avoid accountability. [1, 2]

Credibility Destruction: Accusing an intimate partner of being "crazy" or emotionally unstable to invalidate their claims of abuse.
Trauma Exploitation: Using a partner's known past traumas or clinical diagnoses against them during conflicts.
Chemical Sedation: Historically and modernly over-prescribing psychotropic medications to dull a partner's autonomy or resistance.
DARVO Dynamics: Utilizing the "Deny, Attack, and Reverse Victim and Offender" strategy. An abuser claims they are the actual victim of their partner's alleged mental illness. [1, 2, 3]

The Weaponization of "Therapy-Speak"

The popularization of psychological jargon on social media has led to the casual misuse of clinical terms to win arguments or manipulate others. [1, 2]

Distorting Definitions: Misapplying terms like gaslighting (which requires systematic, deliberate malice) to refer to a simple disagreement or a normal difference in human memory. [1]
Pathologizing Behaviors: Labeling an ordinary character flaw or standard self-confidence as Narcissistic Personality Disorder. [1, 2]
Overusing "Trauma": Categorizing everyday discomfort, a rude coworker, or a bad vacation as biological trauma. This lowers an individual's window of tolerance. [1]
False Shields: Invoking one's own self-diagnosed mental health conditions to excuse abusive behaviors, lying, or cheating. [1]
Evasion of Duty: Using pseudo-therapeutic concepts like "boundaries" or "self-care" as an excuse to avoid collective obligations, mutual compromise, or emotional accountability. [1, 2]

Here you go...

Read it and weep!

Proof that Psychology Today is corrupt

 

 

Download

 

Proof that Jordan Litvak also hires rapist. 

Just face it.

 You can't safely approach me about anything. My fee is $90 million.

sic

 

Not really sure why you keep coming here. It's not like you can do anything about its existence. This blog is a perpetuity.

Abuse Form

 https://www.cchr.org/take-action/report-psychiatric-abuse.html

Fake Doctors

 

 

www.CCHR.Org 

Fake Hospital being laughed at

 

State guardian

I'm going to put up what the guardian Erin Nolan sent me as my inheritance soon.

You can see how much money my mother had in her account before McFraudland killed her with ECT.

It's a cashiers check for .62 cents. 

Courtesy of Erin Nowlan.

It is the corrupt Illinois way. 

You can't stop my protected speech.

I'm on the ground rolling due to the amount of people that visit this place every day. This just goes to show you  that people have a drive to validate their insecurities.

McFraudland

 

More videos and documents from McFarland State Hospital are on the way. 

Where Rape and Fraud run rampant. 

 McFraudland

 https://mcfraudland.blogspot.com/

Illinois

Yeah, you changed the name of McFarland Fake doctor hospital for a bogus reason.

You still lost the Chicago Bears which totally blesses me. 

All the residents and big money are gone or leaving.  

I'm glad it's happening!

I never asked to live next to taco knikkers.

Those illegal aliens destroyed my car. Now you need to replace it with a 2026 Toyota Supra 5 speed. You goddamn will!

The domain names (with the exception of blospot.com) that  resolve to this blog are $85 million a piece after taxes and fees. 

12 sandwich eatin' bitch. 

#power! 

TRUTHSOCIAL.COM 

JordanLitvak.Com

News

They read moms mail

I have the letter that I sent to my mother.

When McFarland staff received it, they opened, copied the letter then resealed it and sent it back to me "undeliverables".

That letter from Schweighart is only able to be bought by Elon Musk now. 

Have fun being short DEI staffed! 

 

Domain Names.

I'M CONVINCED THAT ECT KILLED MY MOTHER WHILE SHE WAS IN THE CUSTODY OF MCFARLAND STATE HOSPITAL.

ALL STAFF WALKED IN LOCKSTEP AND EFFECTIVELY  IMPLEMENTED DAMAGE CONTROL.

The domains that resolve to this blog will go under a ten year renewal.

JORDANLITVAK.COM

ERINNOWLAN.COM 

that's cool.

I can comment on the status, history of this corrupt mental institution and the powers that be just have to sit here and watch.

I can respond to questions, but for my response they have be prepaid for.

Let's just say that Elon Musk would have a tough time paying.

Site gets plenty of traffic

But since this institution is a house of cards, nobody has the balls to do anything about it.

Until I'm paid to remove this, it stays here. 

Freebasing Geritol

That's most likely what the old decision makers are doing at the fake psych hospital. Warehousing people is their duty and employing rapist are their primary missions.

Man, I'm in the wrong racket!

The letter for sale truly outlines the legacy that Andrew McFarland set in place for his successors to follow. 

Fact

Some stuff might be hard for me to prove. But all the individuals that acting In-Concert regarding my findings about my mother  and McFarland fake hospital will see them impossible to disprove. 

Illinois hires people that sell link cards.

It is where the governors went to federal prison and press license plates.

 This is a perpetuity...

Lawsuit

Mother of dead inmate sues.

Letter for sale (cont)

The thing that seems to make this blog entry so popular is that it exposes the incompetence of McFarland's management. With that, removing it will only insulate that fake doctor hospital from accountability. That really kills me is that it's called a mental hospital. That term supports the idea of wellness and cures.

Psychiatry has no cures for any of its invented conditions and diseases. 

Pharmaceuticals, forced "treatment" and shock therapy (ect)  only put a cover on a pseudo science diagnosed conditions.

Let's not forget that human warehousing is how McFarland gets all of that government money.  That is the main impetus of their operation.

A prescription for violence

 As I stated previously, my mom was having her psychotropic drugs manipulated with by fake doctor vrtikapa and Jee roy Johnson which with her breast cancer pain was causing her violent behavior. The wrongful death lawsuit started it all.

https://www.cchr.org/prescription-for-violence/watch/prescription-for-violence.html