Scroll to the bottom for each new posting.

Copyright 2011 - 2016 Heeger.Org


THIS IS A MATTER OF PUBLIC CONCERN

SEE LITVAK MISCONDUCT

You are witnessing protected speech in action. This is protected by US v. Cassidy, Taubman v. Webfeats, Chan v. Ellis, Illinois' Anti-SLAPP statute,The First Amendment and the Clean Hands Doctrine. Which means that this is also free of trademark issues and that you are voluntarily viewing this by your own free will.

Salaries do not include favors, special interest or kickbacks on pharmaceutical company investments if any.

see: Wrongful Interference of inheritance


Jordan Litvak's Salary -
$117,972.00 -salary reduced

Michelle Saddler's Salary - $150,228 - salary reduced

Karen Schweighart's salary - $116,089.14 letter -salary removed

Donald Henke's Salary
- $119,163.56 - salary reduced

Read about Psychiatry



About.Me




My Mothers Will

Bank account was embezzled by Jordan Litvak

Litvak deliberately did business with blacklisted company

Domain name WWW.JORDANLITVAK.COM's registration is pure speech.

McFarland stalls me off long enough to get guardianship of my mother.


McFarland Rape Case

top

FILE A COMPLAINT

This Domain is protected by Illinois' Anti -SLAPP law

To fix depression, all you need is a good diet, exercise and to be surrounded by positive friends and family. Drugs are not the same as medicine. Medicine cures you!

You have to be certain that someone that is displaying mental issues is not suffering from some physical condition. When that has been established as a medical condition, the mental illness issue will mysteriously disappear...

Ask your Psychiatrist/Psychologist if they get kickbacks on the prescriptions that they write. A great way to motivate "doctors" to put you on drugs...

ALL FILES THAT ARE AND WERE PRESENTED ON THIS JOURNAL ARE BACKED UP ON OTHER ONLINE AND OFFLINE FACILITIES AND WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO ANYONE AT ANYTIME.

An anonymous automatic clearing house transfer is required for blog removal. Accruing with daily interest since 2010.

Friday, December 2, 2011

USPS FOIA REQUEST Response November 29, 2011

Sean Heeger
2043 Elm Street
Quincy, IL 62301-3233
RE: FOIA Case No. 2012-GRO-00025
Dear Mr. Heeger:

This responds to your request dated November 28, 2011 for information regarding a signature on a return receipt card. Your request was referred to our office from the US Postal Service Office of Inspector General.

Your request was sent to the Records Office. This office has the responsibility for responding to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. Under the FOIA, 5 USC §552, agencies are mandated to produce records responsive to a request. The core purpose of the FOIA is to provide the public with information about the conduct of government agencies and does not require the Postal Service to answer questions or provide explanations or other information that is not contained in its records. It does not require agencies to create records in response to a request.

It appears you may want to file a complaint; therefore I am referring your letter to our Customer Response Group for direct response to you. You should hear from them shortly.

Sincerely,

Pamela Isreal

Consumer Research Analyst

cc: Ed Wohlganger

475 L’ENFANT PLAZA SW, RM.4541
WASHINGTON DC 20260-2201
(202)268-2608
FAX: (202)268-5353

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thanks for the post.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.