Apparently Anthony didn't include the reason why I can't be with my son and why I can't get my evaluation in his preliminary report (of guardian ad litem).
He refused to give me his email address since I wasn't a client and stated that the web interface to send email to his firm (him) at rblawyers.net would be fine. He also said something about the confusion it would create if I sent e-mail directly (to his inbox).
Having an email thread (papertrail) is important. Making a substantiated claim somewhere down the line simply calls for it. But at least the screen captures from the first e-mail that I sent him and the other attorney in early June show the earliest date that communication was desired.
Having the response to that e-mail in the form of US mail indicates his lack of due diligence. He responded 40 days later.
The telephone in legal matters simply doesn't work for me because everything over the phone is hearsay and can be a race for credibility at times.
Having the response to that e-mail in the form of US mail indicates his lack of due diligence. He responded 40 days later.
The telephone in legal matters simply doesn't work for me because everything over the phone is hearsay and can be a race for credibility at times.
Just like everyone else, I don't trust strangers or lawyers.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for the post.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.